Руководство рпц что это

Материалы по теме

Под председательством Святейшего Патриарха Кирилла состоялось очередное заседание Высшего Церковного Совета

В 45-ю годовщину преставления митрополита Ленинградского и Новгородского Никодима (Ротова) Святейший Патриарх Кирилл совершил заупокойную литию

Заседание Высшего Церковного Совета 5 сентября 2023 года

Заседание Высшего Церковного Совета 27 июня 2023 года

Давайте устроим маленький ликбез на тему «Структура РПЦ». Возьмем только РПЦ на территории России (потому что она есть еще и в других странах, но сейчас не будем отклоняться в сторону).

Ну, всем известно, что во главе РПЦ стоит патриарх. Точнее, является ее предстоятелем. Часто ошибочно говорят: «Патриарх — глава Церкви». Глава Церкви — Христос, а патриарх — глава организации под названием РПЦ (МП). (МП — Московский патриархат — второе официальное название РПЦ. А Московская патриархия — это уже название высшего церковного чиновничьего аппарата во главе с патриархом.) Многие патриарха воспринимают как церковного президента с неограниченными полномочиями (и нынешний патриарх Кирилл (Гундяев) так и пытается себя вести), но в теории патриарх — это первый среди равных епископов, он сам — епископ Москвы, а прочие епископы вполне самодостаточны в своих епархиях. Опять-таки теоретически «Патриарх Московский и всея Руси… подотчетен Поместному и Архиерейскому соборам» (Устав РПЦ, гл. IV, 2).

РПЦ состоит из епархий. Во времена патриаршества Алексия II (Ридигера) епархия обычно совпадала в границах с областью. Архиерей (епископ, архиепископ или митрополит — эти ранги отличаются лишь степенью чести, но в принципе есть только один сан (чин) — епископ) сидел в областном центре, будучи на церковном уровне вроде губернатора.

Нынешний патриарх Кирилл пошел по пути дробления епархий: с каждым годом количество их увеличивается, в некоторых областях уже по четыре епархии с соответствующим количеством епископов. Архиерей областного центра получает звание митрополита и становится первым по чести среди мелкопоместных епископов этой области (но не их начальником).

Иногда в епархии может быть два епископа: один главный, правящий, а другой — викарный, что-то вроде замдиректора, помощника, действующего от лица своего начальника. Обычно викарного епископа дают в помощь в большой епархии или престарелому архиерею, который уже не справляется со своими обязанностями.

Кстати, по правилам каждый архиерей по достижении 75-летнего возраста обязан написать прошение «на покой», но часто он остается на своей кафедре (продолжает управлять епархией) до самой смерти.

При каждом архиерее есть епархиальное управление — бухгалтерия, епархиальный склад, разные отделы — учебный, молодежный, миссионерский, социальный, по взаимодействию с военными, полицией, казачеством и т.п. Бывают разные комиссии, например по подготовке канонизации местных святых. Часто при епархии есть духовное училище или семинария.

Архиерей регулярно собирает епархиальный совет. В этот совет входят маститые священники — благочинные и руководители епархиальных отделов. Они обсуждают разные текущие вопросы, разрабатывают внутренние инструкции, вызывают провинившихся священников на ковер и проч. Но все решения в епархии принимает только архиерей. Правда, в тех епархиях, где архиерей известен слабой волей или слабым здоровьем головы, реальные решения часто принимают те священники или просто прихлебатели — «помощники», которые имеют на него влияние, а епископ только подмахивает документы. Таких влиятельных священников в поповской среде называют «олигархами».

Пару-тройку раз в год (в некоторых епархиях — только один раз) созывается епархиальное собрание. На нем — теоретически — должны бы присутствовать (вместе с духовенством и монашеством) и миряне, чтобы решать общие епархиальные вопросы. Но в реальной практике епсобрание — это что-то вроде пленума обкома КПСС: напыщенные речи архиерея про «углубить и расширить», доклады руководителей отделов о том, что «правсомол всегда готов, а партия — тем паче», перекличка присутствующих, которая может занимать часа два, зачитывание циркуляров из патриархии (об очередном сборе денег), которые все равно потом скинут на электронную почту. В общем, несколько часов формальностей, которые никому не нужны.

В епархии, как и в патриархии, есть церковный суд, состоящий из избранных священников (общецерковный суд — из епископов). На этом суде рассматривают дела провинившихся священников, решается вопрос об их наказании — запрещении в служении или лишении сана. Разумеется, никогда священник не выиграет суд против своего архиерея в епархиальном суде, хотя бывали редкие случаи, когда общецерковный суд рассматривал апелляцию священника и отменял несправедливые решения (преще́ния, то есть наказания в виде запретов) епархиального архиерея. Правда, после «победы» священнику все равно придется покинуть епархию, потому что житья ему там уже не будет.

Благочинные — это священники, которые исполняют функции бригадира или прораба на вверенном им участке. Например, крупный город делится на несколько условных районов (область также делится на такие «провинциальные» районы) и назначается священник, надзирающий над остальными. Благочинный тоже время от времени собирает настоятелей приходов на бессмысленные собрания благочиния, где тратят время на пустые бумажки. Главная же функция благочинного — быть глазами и ушами архиерея, выбивать из своих подчиненных священников епархиальные взносы и отчеты.

Между собой рядовые настоятели приходов порой называют своих благочинных «злочинными» или «бесчинными», потому что в руках благочинного обычно находится судьба любого священника — он может оклеветать того перед архиереем, предложить снять или перевести по надуманному поводу, например, чтобы освободить богатый хороший приход для себя или своего родственника в сане. Чаще всего архиерей прислушивается к благочинному, а мнение рядового настоятеля и его протесты просто никого не интересуют.

Следующий уровень — настоятели приходов. Надо сразу учесть, что приход и храм — это не одно и то же. Приход — это юридическая единица в епархии, существующая в первую очередь на бумаге и в органах юстиции. Сейчас это называется МРОП — местная религиозная организация прихода храма такого-то. То есть на бумаге и в отчетах приход может быть, а храма еще нет, даже земельного участка под храм может еще не быть. Приход начинается с того, что десять человек (любых, хоть прихожан другого прихода) собираются на учредительное собрание, они могут зарегистрировать приход на домашний адрес одного из учредителей, а потом уже начинается процесс оформления земли, строительства храма и т.п.

Но вот храм есть и у прихода есть настоятель — священник, который всем руководит: и людьми, и хозяйством. Он может быть один в храме, но могут у него быть подчиненные священники — обычные клирики (то есть члены клира, духовенства). Настоятель в своих руках держит всю полноту власти, все финансы, он общается с благочинным и архиереем, а рядовые священники служат, исполняют требы и прочие рутинные священнические обязанности. Разумеется, доход настоятеля обычно несравним с зарплатами рядовых клириков, ну, впрочем, как и в любой светской фирме.

Так происходит в реальности, хотя (часто приходится повторять это слово) теоретически управлять приходской жизнью должно приходское собрание из всех активных взрослых членов прихода, на котором должны решаться все вопросы — начиная со стройки, ремонта, заканчивая зарплатами клириков и настоятеля. Еще на приходе есть фиктивные органы — ревизионная комиссия и приходской совет, но… см. выше по поводу «теоретически».

Практически же — и это одна из основных проблем РПЦ в последние 30 лет — миряне, прихожане в церкви ничего не решают ни на своем родном приходе, ни в масштабах всей РПЦ. По последним двум уставам РПЦ (1988 и 2000 гг.) абсолютной властью в епархии и на приходах обладает только архиерей. Он может все: снять в любой момент без объяснения причин настоятеля, разогнать приходскую общину, если она выступает против несправедливых решений епископа. В случае конфликта закон всегда будет на стороне архиерея, все имущество прихода до последнего гвоздя принадлежит ему (епархии), поэтому приход не сможет «отложиться» от своего архиерея вместе со своим храмом — придется уйти, оставив все то, что, возможно, построено руками прихожан и на их деньги.

Эта схема во многом объясняет жизнь нынешней РПЦ. Система построена таким образом, что любые реформы снизу невозможны, потому что голоса мирян и простых священников ничего не значат ни в моральном, ни в юридическом смысле, а все «реформы» сверху направлены только на укрепление власти верхушки руководства РПЦ, ее абсолютизма.

Впрочем, тут патриархия идет рука об руку с нашим дорогим государством.

У каждой конфессии в мире есть предводитель, например, глава Православной Церкви – это Патриарх Московский и всея Руси Кирилл.

Но помимо него церковь имеет и другую структуру руководства.

Оглавление:

Кто глава Русской Православной Церкви

Патриарх Кирилл – это руководитель РПЦ.

Он руководит церковной жизнью страны, а также Патриарх — начальник Троице-Сергиевой лавры и еще нескольких обителей.

Какова иерархия РПЦ среди священнослужителей

На самом деле церковь имеет довольно сложную структуру и иерархию. Каждый священнослужитель выполняет свою роль и занимает предписанное ему место в этой системе.

Схема православной церкви имеет три уровня, которые были созданы еще в самом начале зарождения христианской религии. Все служители делятся на такие категории:

1. Диаконы.
2. Священники.
3. Епископы.

Помимо этого, они поделены на «черное» и «белое» духовенство. К «черному» относятся монахи, а к «белому» мирские священнослужители.

Структура РПЦ — схема и описание

В ввиду некоторой сложности церковной структуры, ее стоит рассмотреть более детально, для глубокого понимания алгоритмов работы священников.

Звания епископов

К ним относятся:

1. Патриарх: пожизненное главное звание предводителя РПЦ, на данный момент на Руси это Кирилл.
2. Викарий: правая рука епископа, его заместитель, но он не имеет своей епархии и не может управлять епархией архиерея.
3. Митрополит: наместник, руководящий митрополиями, в том числе и за пределами Российской Федерации.
4. Архиепископ: звание старшего епископа, считается почетным титулом.
5. Епископ: третья ступень священства в православной иерархии, часто имеет звание архиерея, управляет епархией и назначается Священным синодом.

Звания иереев

Иереи делятся на «черных» и «белых».

Рассмотрим «черное» духовенство:

1. Иеромонах: монах-священнослужитель, к нему принято обращаться словами: «Ваше Преподобие».
2. Игумен: руководитель (настоятель) монастыря. До 2011 в России это звание являлось почетным и не обязательно соответствовало посту начальника какой-либо обители.
3. Архимандрит: наивысшее звание для священнослужителя, принявшего монашеский постриг. Часто является настоятелем крупных монашеских обителей.

К «белым» чинам относят:

1. Протопресвитер: высший чин РПЦ в его «белой» части. Дается как награда за особую выслугу в некоторых случаях и только по просьбе Священного синода.
2. Протоиерей: старший священник, также может использоваться формулировка: старший иерей. Чаще всего протоиерей осуществляет руководство каким-либо храмом. Получить такую должность можно не ранее пяти лет верной службы по получении наперстного креста и не раньше десяти лет после хиротонии.
3. Иерей: младший чин священнослужителей. Священник может быть женат. К такому человеку принято обращаться так: «Батюшка» или «Отец, …», где после отца идет имя священника.

Звания диаконов

Далее следует ступень диаконов, они тоже делятся на «черное» и «белое» духовенство.

Список «Черного» духовенства:

1. Архидиакон: старший чин среди диаконов в монашеской обители. Его дают за особые заслуги и выслугу.
2. Иеродиакон: священник-монах любого монастыря. Стать иеродиаконом можно после таинства хиротонии и пострига в монахи.

«Белое»:

1. Протодиакон: основной епархиальный диакон, к нему, как и к архидиакону, принято обращаться со словами: «Ваше высокоблаговестие».
2. Диакон: священник, который стоит на самой начальной ступени иерархии РПЦ. Это помощники для остальных, более высоких рангов священнослужителей.

Заключение

РПЦ имеет одновременно сложную, но логичную организацию. Следует понимать основное правило: её устройство таково, что из «белого» духовенства невозможно попасть в «черное» без монашеского пострига, а также невозможно не будучи монахом занять многие высокие посты в иерархии православной церкви.

Заседание Высшего Церковного Совета 4 сентября 2013 года

Высший Церковный Совет Русской Православной Церкви — орган управления Московского Патриархата возглавляемый патриархом Московским и всея Руси и объединяющий глав учреждений Священного Синода Русской Православной Церкви

Учреждён Всероссийским Собором в 1917 году. Состоял из патриарха, трёх членов Священного Синода, а также представителей приходского духовенства, монашествующих и мирян. Намеченный на 1921 год Поместный Собор созвать не удалось и формально в связи с истечением трехлетнего межсоборного срока полномочия избранных членов ВЦС прекратились, но фактически они были продолжены на неопределенно долгий срок до будущего Собора. Деятельность ВЦС продолжалась вплоть до апреля 1922 года, но произошедший в мае того года обновленческий раскол прервал её.

Впоследствии именем «Высшего Церковного Совета» пользовались раскольники тех лет, учредившие в 1923 году обновленческий, а в 1926 — григорианский «Временный» ВЦС.

В составе Русской Православной Церкви Высший Церковный Совет был возрожден в 2011 году. Московский Архиерейский Собор 2-4 февраля того года постановил придать регулярным совещаниям глав Синодальных учреждений «формальный статус с именованием их Высшим Церковным Советом, по аналогии с органом, учреждённым Всероссийским Церковным Собором в 1917 году.» Образование Высшего Церковного Совета было поручено Священному Синоду, который 22 марта того же года принял Положение о Высшем Церковном Совете Русской Православной Церкви и утвердил его первоначальный состав. На 5 сентября 2023 года в него входили [1]:

Состав

• Кирилл (Гундяев), патриарх Московский и всея Руси, председатель Высшего Церковного Совета

• Павел (Пономарев), митр. Крутицкий, руководитель Управления Московской Патриархии по делам епархий в странах ближнего зарубежья
• Дионисий (Порубай), митр. Воскресенский, управляющий делами Московской Патриархии, первый викарий патриарха Московского и всея Руси
• Антоний (Севрюк), митр. Волоколамский, председатель Отдела внешних церковных связей Московского Патриархата
• Климент (Капалин), митр. Калужский, председатель Издательского совета Русской Православной Церкви
• Феогност (Гузиков), митр. Каширский, председатель Синодального отдела по монастырям и монашеству
• Кирилл (Покровский), митр. Ставропольский, председатель Синодального комитета по взаимодействию с казачеством, и.о. председателя Синодального отдела по взаимодействию с Вооруженными силами и правоохранительными органами
• Митрофан (Баданин), митр. Мурманский, председатель Патриаршей комиссии по вопросам физической культуры и спорта
• Тихон (Шевкунов), митр. Псковский, председатель Патриаршего совета по культуре
• Евгений (Кульберг), митр. Екатеринбургский, председатель Синодального отдела религиозного образования и катехизации Русской Православной Церкви
• Фома (Мосолов), архиеп. Одинцовский, руководитель Административного секретариата Московской Патриархии
• Иринарх (Грезин), еп. Раменский, председатель Синодального отдела по тюремному служению
• Пантелеимон (Шатов), еп. Верейский, председатель Синодального отдела по церковной благотворительности и социальному служению
• Серафим (Амельченков), еп. Истринский, председатель Синодального отдела по делам молодежи
• Евфимий (Моисеев), еп. Луховицкий, председатель Синодального миссионерского отдела
• Никандр (Пилишин), архим., председатель Финансово-хозяйственного управления Московского Патриархата
• Максим Козлов, прот., председатель Учебного комитета при Священном Синоде, ректор Сретенской духовной академии
• Ксения (Чернега), игум., руководитель Правового управления Московской Патриархии
• Легойда Владимир Романович, председатель Синодального отдела по взаимоотношениям Церкви с обществом и СМИ

В повестку заседания были включены выступления и доклады по следующим темам: 1) Доклад о работе Синодального отдела по взаимодействию с Вооруженными Силами и правоохранительными органами 2) Годовой доклад: Развитие системы базового богословского образования для монашествующих. Итог 2022 года и перспективы в 2023 году 3) Годовой доклад: Деятельность Патриаршего совета по культуре 4) О расширении региональной составляющей празднования Дня славянской письменности и культуры 5) Презентация богослужебного Евангелия на английском языке.

В заседании 5 сентября 2023 года также приняли участие [2]:

• Николай (Погребняк), еп. Балашихинский, руководитель и главный редактор Издательства Московской Патриархии
• Савва (Тутунов), еп. Зеленоградский, заместитель управляющего делами Московской Патриархии
• Петр (Еремеев), игум., председатель Межведомственной комиссии по вопросам образования монашествующих Русской Православной Церкви
• Димитрий Василенков, прот., главный военный священник духовенства, окормляющего военнослужащих Вооруженных сил России и сотрудников иных силовых структур в зоне СВО
• Игорь Якимчук, прот., заместитель председателя Отдела внешних церковных связей
• Щипков Александр Владимирович, первый заместитель председателя Синодального отдела по взаимоотношениям Церкви с обществом и СМИ, заместитель главы Всемирного русского народного собора, ректор Российского православного университета св. Иоанна Богослова

Использованные материалы

• «Высший Церковный Совет», Православная энциклопедия, т. 10, сс. 109-111:
• http://www.pravenc.ru/text/161111.html
• Страница официального сайта Московского Патриархата:
• http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/1435494.html
• «Святейший Патриарх Кирилл возглавил очередное заседание Высшего Церковного Совета», официальный сайт Московской Патриархии, 4 сентября 2013:
• http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/3207925.html — фото

---

[1]  Высший Церковный Совет Русской Православной Церкви // официальный сайт Русской Православной Церкви, http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/1435494

[2]  Под председательством Святейшего Патриарха Кирилла состоялось очередное заседание Высшего Церковного Совета // официальный сайт Русской Православной Церкви, 5 сентября 2023 года, http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/6056580.html

Russian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate)
Russian: Русская православная церковь
Cathedral of Christ the Saviour in Moscow, Russia
Abbreviation	ROC
Classification	Eastern Orthodox
Orientation	Russian Orthodoxy
Scripture	Elizabeth Bible (Church Slavonic) Synodal Bible (Russian)
Theology	Eastern Orthodox theology
Polity	Episcopal
Governance	Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church
Structure	Communion
Primate	Patriarch Kirill of Moscow
Bishops	382 (2019)[1]
Clergy	40,514 full-time clerics, including 35,677 presbyters and 4,837 deacons[1]
Parishes	38,649 (2019)[1]
Dioceses	314 (2019)[2]
Monasteries	972 (474 male and 498 female) (2019)[1]
Associations	World Council of Churches[3]
Region	Russia, post-Soviet states, Russian diaspora
Language	Church Slavonic, Russian
Liturgy	Byzantine Rite
Headquarters	Danilov Monastery, Moscow, Russia 55°42′40″N 37°37′45″E / 55.71111°N 37.62917°E
Founder	Saint Vladimir the Great[4][a]
Origin	988 Kievan Rus’
Independence	1448, de facto[7]
Recognition	1589, by Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople 1593, by Pan-Orthodox Synod of Patriarchs at Constantinople
Separations	Spiritual Christianity (16th century onwards) Old Believers (mid-17th century) Catacomb Church (1925) True Russian Orthodox Church (2007; very small) Ukrainian Orthodox Church (2022) Latvian Orthodox Church (2022)
Members	110 million (95 million in Russia, total of 15 million in the linked autonomous churches)[8][9][10][11]
Other name(s)	Russian Church Moscow Patriarchate
Official website	patriarchia.ru

The Russian Orthodox Church (ROC; Russian: Русская православная церковь, romanized: Russkaya pravoslavnaya tserkov, abbreviated as РПЦ), alternatively legally known as the Moscow Patriarchate (Russian: Московский патриархат, romanized: Moskovskiy patriarkhat),^[12] is an autocephalous Eastern Orthodox Christian church. It has 194 dioceses inside Russia.^[13] The primate of the ROC is the Patriarch of Moscow and all Rus’.

The Christianization of Kievan Rus’ commenced in 988 with the baptism of the Rus’ Grand Prince of Kiev—Vladimir the Great—and his people by the clergy of the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople. The ecclesiastical title of Metropolitan of Kiev and all Rus’ remained in the jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate until 1686.

The ROC currently claims exclusive jurisdiction over the Eastern Orthodox Christians, irrespective of their ethnic background, who reside in the former member republics of the Soviet Union, excluding Georgia. The ROC also created the autonomous Church of Japan and Chinese Orthodox Church. The ROC eparchies in Belarus and Latvia, since the fall of the Soviet Union in the 1990s, enjoy various degrees of self-government, albeit short of the status of formal ecclesiastical autonomy.

The ROC should also not be confused with the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia (or ROCOR, also known as the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad), headquartered in the United States. The ROCOR was instituted in the 1920s by Russian communities outside the Soviet Union, which had refused to recognise the authority of the Moscow Patriarchate that was de facto headed by Metropolitan Sergius Stragorodsky. The two churches reconciled on 17 May 2007; the ROCOR is now a self-governing part of the Russian Orthodox Church.

History[edit]

Kievan Rus’[edit]

The Christian community that developed into what is now known as the Russian Orthodox Church is traditionally said to have been founded by the Apostle Andrew, who is thought to have visited Scythia and Greek colonies along the northern coast of the Black Sea. According to one of the legends, Andrew reached the future location of Kiev and foretold the foundation of a great Christian city.^[14][15] The spot where he reportedly erected a cross is now marked by St. Andrew’s Cathedral.

Transfer of the see to Moscow; de facto independence of the Moscow Church[edit]

As Kiev was losing its political, cultural, and economical significance due to the Mongol invasion, Metropolitan Maximus moved to Vladimir in 1299; his successor, Metropolitan Peter moved the residence to Moscow in 1325.

In 1439, at the Council of Florence, some Orthodox hierarchs from Byzantium as well as Metropolitan Isidore, who represented the Russian Church, signed a union with the Roman Church, whereby the Eastern Church would recognise the primacy of the Pope. However, the Moscow Prince Vasili II rejected the act of the Council of Florence brought to Moscow by Isidore in March 1441. Isidore was in the same year removed from his position as an apostate and expelled from Moscow. The Russian metropolitanate remained effectively vacant for the next few years due largely to the dominance of Uniates in Constantinople then. In December 1448, Jonas, a Russian bishop, was installed by the Council of Russian bishops in Moscow as Metropolitan of Kiev and All Russia^[16] (with permanent residence in Moscow) without the consent from Constantinople. This occurred five years prior to the fall of Constantinople in 1453 and, unintentionally, signified the beginning of an effectively independent church structure in the Moscow (North-Eastern Russian) part of the Russian Church. Subsequently, there developed a theory in Moscow that saw Moscow as the Third Rome, the legitimate successor to Constantinople, and the Primate of the Moscow Church as head of all the Russian Church. Meanwhile, the newly established in 1458 Russian Orthodox (initially Uniate) metropolitanate in Kiev (then in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and subsequently in the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth) continued under the jurisdiction of the Ecumenical See until 1686, when it was provisionally transferred to the jurisdiction of Moscow.

Autocephaly and schism[edit]

During the reign of Tsar Fyodor I, his brother-in-law, Boris Godunov, contacted the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople, who «was much embarrassed for want of funds».^{[clarification needed][17]}

Several years after the Council of Pereyaslav (1654) that heralded the subsequent incorporation of eastern regions of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth into the Tsardom of Russia, the see of the Metropolitan of Kiev and all Rus’ was transferred to the Moscow Patriarchate (1686).

Peter the Great[edit]

Peter the Great (1682–1725) had an agenda of radical westernization of Russian government, army, dress and manners. He was trying to make Russia a power that could rival Europe in battles and politics. Peter was not religious and had a low regard for the Church, so he put it under tight governmental control. He replaced the Patriarch with a Holy Synod, which he controlled. The Tsar appointed all bishops. A clerical career was not a route chosen by upper-class society. Most parish priests were sons of priests, were very poorly educated, and very poorly paid. The monks in the monasteries had a slightly higher status; they were not allowed to marry. Politically, the church was impotent. Catherine the Great later in the 18th century seized most of the church lands, and put the priests on a small salary supplemented by fees for services such as baptism and marriage.^[18]

Expansion[edit]

In the aftermath of the Treaty of Pereyaslav, the Ottomans (supposedly acting on behalf of the Russian regent Sophia Alekseyevna) pressured the Patriarch of Constantinople into transferring the Metropolitan of Kiev and all Rus’ from the jurisdiction of Constantinople to that of Moscow. The handover brought millions of faithful and half a dozen dioceses under the ultimate administrative care of the Patriarch of Moscow and all Rus’ (and later of the Holy Synod of Russia), leading to the significant Ukrainian presence in the Russian Church, which continued well into the 18th century, with Theophan Prokopovich, Epiphanius Slavinetsky, Stephen Yavorsky and Demetrius of Rostov being among the most notable representatives of this trend.^[19] The exact terms and conditions of the handover of the Kiev Metropolis are a contested issue.^{[20][21][22][23]}

In 1700, after Patriarch Adrian’s death, Peter the Great prevented a successor from being named, and in 1721, following the advice of Theophan Prokopovich, Archbishop of Pskov, the Holy and Supreme Synod was established under Archbishop Stephen Yavorsky to govern the church instead of a single primate. This was the situation until shortly after the Russian Revolution of 1917, at which time the Local Council (more than half of its members being lay persons) adopted the decision to restore the Patriarchate. On 5 November (according to the Julian calendar) a new patriarch, Tikhon, was named through casting lots.

The late 18th century saw the rise of starchestvo under Paisiy Velichkovsky and his disciples at the Optina Monastery. This marked a beginning of a significant spiritual revival in the Russian Church after a lengthy period of modernization, personified by such figures as Demetrius of Rostov and Platon of Moscow. Aleksey Khomyakov, Ivan Kireevsky and other lay theologians with Slavophile leanings elaborated some key concepts of the renovated Orthodox doctrine, including that of sobornost. The resurgence of Eastern Orthodoxy was reflected in Russian literature, an example is the figure of Starets Zosima in Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s Brothers Karamazov.

In the Russian Orthodox Church, the clergy, over time, formed a hereditary caste of priests. Marrying outside of these priestly families was strictly forbidden; indeed, some bishops did not even tolerate their clergy marrying outside of the priestly families of their diocese.^[24]

Fin-de-siècle religious renaissance[edit]

In 1909, a volume of essays appeared under the title Vekhi («Milestones» or «Landmarks»), authored by a group of leading left-wing intellectuals, including Sergei Bulgakov, Peter Struve and former Marxists.

It is possible to see a similarly renewed vigor and variety in religious life and spirituality among the lower classes, especially after the upheavals of 1905. Among the peasantry, there was widespread interest in spiritual-ethical literature and non-conformist moral-spiritual movements, an upsurge in pilgrimage and other devotions to sacred spaces and objects (especially icons), persistent beliefs in the presence and power of the supernatural (apparitions, possession, walking-dead, demons, spirits, miracles and magic), the renewed vitality of local «ecclesial communities» actively shaping their own ritual and spiritual lives, sometimes in the absence of clergy, and defining their own sacred places and forms of piety. Also apparent was the proliferation of what the Orthodox establishment branded as «sectarianism», including both non-Eastern Orthodox Christian denominations, notably Baptists, and various forms of popular Orthodoxy and mysticism.^[25]

Russian Revolution and Civil War[edit]

In 1914, there were 55,173 Russian Orthodox churches and 29,593 chapels, 112,629 priests and deacons, 550 monasteries and 475 convents with a total of 95,259 monks and nuns in Russia.^[26]

The year 1917 was a major turning point in Russian history, and also the Russian Orthodox Church.^[27] In early March 1917 (O.S.), the Tsar was forced to abdicate, the Russian empire began to implode, and the government’s direct control of the Church was all but over by August 1917. On 15 August (O.S.), in the Moscow Dormition Cathedral in the Kremlin, the Local (Pomestniy) Council of the ROC, the first such convention since the late 17th century, opened. The council continued its sessions until September 1918 and adopted a number of important reforms, including the restoration of Patriarchate, a decision taken 3 days after the Bolsheviks overthrew the Provisional Government in Petrograd on 25 October (O.S.). On 5 November, Metropolitan Tikhon of Moscow was selected as the first Russian Patriarch after about 200 years of Synodal rule.

In early February 1918, the Bolshevik-controlled government of Soviet Russia enacted the Decree on separation of church from state and school from church that proclaimed separation of church and state in Russia, freedom to «profess any religion or profess none», deprived religious organisations of the right to own any property and legal status. Legal religious activity in the territories controlled by Bolsheviks was effectively reduced to services and sermons inside church buildings. The Decree and attempts by Bolshevik officials to requisition church property caused sharp resentment on the part of the ROC clergy and provoked violent clashes on some occasions: on 1 February (19 January O.S.), hours after the bloody confrontation in Petrograd’s Alexander Nevsky Lavra between the Bolsheviks trying to take control of the monastery’s premises and the believers, Patriarch Tikhon issued a proclamation that anathematised the perpetrators of such acts.^[28]

The church was caught in the crossfire of the Russian Civil War that began later in 1918, and church leadership, despite their attempts to be politically neutral (from the autumn of 1918), as well as the clergy generally were perceived by the Soviet authorities as a «counter-revolutionary» force and thus subject to suppression and eventual liquidation.

In the first five years after the Bolshevik revolution, 28 bishops and 1,200 priests were executed.^[29]

Under Soviet rule[edit]

The Soviet Union, formally created in December 1922, was the first state to have elimination of religion as an ideological objective espoused by the country’s ruling political party. Toward that end, the Communist regime confiscated church property, ridiculed religion, harassed believers, and propagated materialism and atheism in schools.^{[citation needed]} Actions toward particular religions, however, were determined by State interests, and most organized religions were never outlawed.

Orthodox clergy and active believers were treated by the Soviet law-enforcement apparatus as anti-revolutionary elements and were habitually subjected to formal prosecutions on political charges, arrests, exiles, imprisonment in camps, and later could also be incarcerated in mental hospitals.^[30][31]

However, the Soviet policy vis-a-vis organised religion vacillated over time between, on the one hand, a utopian determination to substitute secular rationalism for what they considered to be an outmoded «superstitious» worldview and, on the other, pragmatic acceptance of the tenaciousness of religious faith and institutions. In any case, religious beliefs and practices did persist, not only in the domestic and private spheres but also in the scattered public spaces allowed by a state that recognized its failure to eradicate religion and the political dangers of an unrelenting culture war.^[32]

The Russian Orthodox church was drastically weakened in May 1922, when the Renovated (Living) Church, a reformist movement backed by the Soviet secret police, broke away from Patriarch Tikhon (also see the Josephites and the Russian True Orthodox Church), a move that caused division among clergy and faithful that persisted until 1946.

Between 1917 and 1935, 130,000 Eastern Orthodox priests were arrested. Of these, 95,000 were put to death.^{[citation needed]} Many thousands of victims of persecution became recognized in a special canon of saints known as the «new martyrs and confessors of Russia».^{[citation needed]}

When Patriarch Tikhon died in 1925, the Soviet authorities forbade patriarchal election. Patriarchal locum tenens (acting Patriarch) Metropolitan Sergius (Stragorodsky, 1887–1944), going against the opinion of a major part of the church’s parishes, in 1927 issued a declaration accepting the Soviet authority over the church as legitimate, pledging the church’s cooperation with the government and condemning political dissent within the church. By this declaration, Sergius granted himself authority that he, being a deputy of imprisoned Metropolitan Peter and acting against his will, had no right to assume according to the XXXIV Apostolic canon, which led to a split with the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia abroad and the Russian True Orthodox Church (Russian Catacomb Church) within the Soviet Union, as they allegedly remained faithful to the Canons of the Apostles, declaring the part of the church led by Metropolitan Sergius schism, sometimes coined Sergianism. Due to this canonical disagreement it is disputed which church has been the legitimate successor to the Russian Orthodox Church that had existed before 1925.^{[33][34][35][36]}

In 1927, Metropolitan Eulogius (Georgiyevsky) of Paris broke with the ROCOR (along with Metropolitan Platon (Rozhdestvensky) of New York, leader of the Russian Metropolia in America). In 1930, after taking part in a prayer service in London in supplication for Christians suffering under the Soviets, Evlogy was removed from office by Sergius and replaced. Most of Evlogy’s parishes in Western Europe remained loyal to him; Evlogy then petitioned Ecumenical Patriarch Photius II to be received under his canonical care and was received in 1931, making a number of parishes of Russian Orthodox Christians outside Russia, especially in Western Europe an Exarchate of the Ecumenical Patriarchate as the Archdiocese of Russian Orthodox churches in Western Europe.

Moreover, in the 1929 elections, the Orthodox Church attempted to formulate itself as a full-scale opposition group to the Communist Party, and attempted to run candidates of its own against the Communist candidates. Article 124 of the 1936 Soviet Constitution officially allowed for freedom of religion within the Soviet Union, and along with initial statements of it being a multi-candidate election, the Church again attempted to run its own religious candidates in the 1937 elections. However the support of multicandidate elections was retracted several months before the elections were held and in neither 1929 nor 1937 were any candidates of the Orthodox Church elected.^[37]

After Nazi Germany’s attack on the Soviet Union in 1941, Joseph Stalin revived the Russian Orthodox Church to intensify patriotic support for the war effort. In the early hours of 5 September 1943, Metropolitans Sergius (Stragorodsky), Alexius (Simansky) and Nicholas (Yarushevich) had a meeting with Stalin and received permission to convene a council on 8 September 1943, which elected Sergius Patriarch of Moscow and all the Rus’. This is considered by some as violation of the Apostolic canon, as no church hierarch could be consecrated by secular authorities.^[33] A new patriarch was elected, theological schools were opened, and thousands of churches began to function. The Moscow Theological Academy Seminary, which had been closed since 1918, was re-opened.

In December 2017, the Security Service of Ukraine lifted classified top secret status of documents revealing that the NKVD of the USSR and its units were engaged in the selection of candidates for participation in the 1945 Local Council from the representatives of the clergy and the laity. NKVD demanded «to outline persons who have religious authority among the clergy and believers, and at the same time checked for civic or patriotic work». In the letter sent in September 1944, it was emphasized: «It is important to ensure that the number of nominated candidates is dominated by the agents of the NKBD, capable of holding the line that we need at the Council».^[38][39]

Persecution under Khrushchev[edit]

A new and widespread persecution of the church was subsequently instituted under the leadership of Nikita Khrushchev and Leonid Brezhnev. A second round of repression, harassment and church closures took place between 1959 and 1964 when Nikita Khrushchev was in office. The number of Orthodox churches fell from around 22,000 in 1959 to around 8,000 in 1965;^[40] priests, monks and faithful were killed or imprisoned^{[citation needed]} and the number of functioning monasteries was reduced to less than twenty.

Subsequent to Khrushchev’s ousting, the Church and the government remained on unfriendly terms^[vague] until 1988. In practice, the most important aspect of this conflict was that openly religious people could not join the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, which meant that they could not hold any political office. However, among the general population, large numbers^{[clarification needed]} remained religious.

Some Orthodox believers and even priests took part in the dissident movement and became prisoners of conscience. The Orthodox priests Gleb Yakunin, Sergiy Zheludkov and others spent years in Soviet prisons and exile for their efforts in defending freedom of worship.^[41] Among the prominent figures of that time were Dmitri Dudko^[42] and Aleksandr Men. Although he tried to keep away from practical work of the dissident movement intending to better fulfil his calling as a priest, there was a spiritual link between Men and many of the dissidents. For some of them he was a friend; for others, a godfather; for many (including Yakunin), a spiritual father.^{[43][obsolete source][unreliable source?]}

By 1987 the number of functioning churches in the Soviet Union had fallen to 6,893 and the number of functioning monasteries to just 18. In 1987 in the Russian SFSR, between 40% and 50% of newborn babies (depending on the region) were baptized. Over 60% of all deceased received Christian funeral services.^{[citation needed]}

Glasnost and evidence of collaboration with the KGB[edit]

Beginning in the late 1980s, under Mikhail Gorbachev, the new political and social freedoms resulted in the return of many church buildings to the church, so they could be restored by local parishioners. A pivotal point in the history of the Russian Orthodox Church came in 1988, the millennial anniversary of the Christianization of Kievan Rus’. Throughout the summer of that year, major government-supported celebrations took place in Moscow and other cities; many older churches and some monasteries were reopened. An implicit ban on religious propaganda on state TV was finally lifted. For the first time in the history of the Soviet Union, people could watch live transmissions of church services on television.

Gleb Yakunin, a critic of the Moscow Patriarchate who was one of those who briefly gained access to the KGB’s archives in the early 1990s, argued that the Moscow Patriarchate was «practically a subsidiary, a sister company of the KGB».^[44] Critics charge that the archives showed the extent of active participation of the top ROC hierarchs in the KGB efforts overseas.^{[45][46][47][48][49][50]} George Trofimoff, the highest-ranking US military officer ever indicted for, and convicted of, espionage by the United States and sentenced to life imprisonment on 27 September 2001, had been «recruited into the service of the KGB»^[51] by Igor Susemihl (a.k.a. Zuzemihl), a bishop in the Russian Orthodox Church (subsequently, a high-ranking hierarch—the ROC Metropolitan Iriney of Vienna, who died in July 1999).^[52]

Konstanin Kharchev, former chairman of the Soviet Council on Religious Affairs, explained: «Not a single candidate for the office of bishop or any other high-ranking office, much less a member of the Holy Synod, went through without confirmation by the Central Committee of the CPSU and the KGB».^[48] Professor Nathaniel Davis points out: «If the bishops wished to defend their people and survive in office, they had to collaborate to some degree with the KGB, with the commissioners of the Council for Religious Affairs, and with other party and governmental authorities».^[53] Patriarch Alexy II, acknowledged that compromises were made with the Soviet government by bishops of the Moscow Patriarchate, himself included, and he publicly repented for these compromises.^[54][55]

Post-Soviet era[edit]

Patriarch Aleksey II (1990–2008)[edit]

Metropolitan Alexy (Ridiger) of Leningrad, ascended the patriarchal throne in 1990 and presided over the partial return of Orthodox Christianity to Russian society after 70 years of repression, transforming the ROC to something resembling its pre-communist appearance; some 15,000 churches had been re-opened or built by the end of his tenure, and the process of recovery and rebuilding has continued under his successor Patriarch Kirill. According to official figures, in 2016 the Church had 174 dioceses, 361 bishops, and 34,764 parishes served by 39,800 clergy. There were 926 monasteries and 30 theological schools.^[56]

The Russian Church also sought to fill the ideological vacuum left by the collapse of Communism and even, in the opinion of some analysts, became «a separate branch of power».^[57]

In August 2000, the ROC adopted its Basis of the Social Concept^[58] and in July 2008, its Basic Teaching on Human Dignity, Freedom and Rights.^[59]

Under Patriarch Aleksey, there were difficulties in the relationship between the Russian Orthodox Church and the Vatican, especially since 2002, when Pope John Paul II created a Catholic diocesan structure for Russian territory. The leaders of the Russian Church saw this action as a throwback to prior attempts by the Vatican to proselytize the Russian Orthodox faithful to become Roman Catholic. This point of view was based upon the stance of the Russian Orthodox Church (and the Eastern Orthodox Church) that the Church of Rome is in schism, after breaking off from the Orthodox Church. The Roman Catholic Church, on the other hand, while acknowledging the primacy of the Russian Orthodox Church in Russia, believed that the small Roman Catholic minority in Russia, in continuous existence since at least the 18th century, should be served by a fully developed church hierarchy with a presence and status in Russia, just as the Russian Orthodox Church is present in other countries (including constructing a cathedral in Rome, near the Vatican).

There occurred strident conflicts with the Ecumenical Patriarchate, most notably over the Orthodox Church in Estonia in the mid-1990s, which resulted in unilateral suspension of eucharistic relationship between the churches by the ROC.^[60] The tension lingered on and could be observed at the meeting in Ravenna in early October 2007 of participants in the Orthodox–Catholic Dialogue: the representative of the Moscow Patriarchate, Bishop Hilarion Alfeyev, walked out of the meeting due to the presence of representatives from the Estonian Apostolic Orthodox Church which is in the jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate. At the meeting, prior to the departure of the Russian delegation, there were also substantive disagreements about the wording of a proposed joint statement among the Orthodox representatives.^[61] After the departure of the Russian delegation, the remaining Orthodox delegates approved the form which had been advocated by the representatives of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.^[62] The Ecumenical See’s representative in Ravenna said that Hilarion’s position «should be seen as an expression of authoritarianism whose goal is to exhibit the influence of the Moscow Church. But like last year in Belgrade, all Moscow achieved was to isolate itself once more since no other Orthodox Church followed its lead, remaining instead faithful to Constantinople.»^[63][64]

Canon Michael Bourdeaux, former president of the Keston Institute, said in January 2008 that «the Moscow Patriarchate acts as though it heads a state church, while the few Orthodox clergy who oppose the church-state symbiosis face severe criticism, even loss of livelihood.»^[65] Such a view is backed up by other observers of Russian political life.^[66] Clifford J. Levy of The New York Times wrote in April 2008: «Just as the government has tightened control over political life, so, too, has it intruded in matters of faith. The Kremlin’s surrogates in many areas have turned the Russian Orthodox Church into a de facto official religion, warding off other Christian denominations that seem to offer the most significant competition for worshipers. […] This close alliance between the government and the Russian Orthodox Church has become a defining characteristic of Mr. Putin’s tenure, a mutually reinforcing choreography that is usually described here as working ‘in symphony’.»^[67]

Throughout Patriarch Alexy’s reign, the massive program of costly restoration and reopening of devastated churches and monasteries (as well as the construction of new ones) was criticized for having eclipsed the church’s principal mission of evangelizing.^[68][69]

On 5 December 2008, the day of Patriarch Alexy’s death, the Financial Times said: «While the church had been a force for liberal reform under the Soviet Union, it soon became a center of strength for conservatives and nationalists in the post-communist era. Alexei’s death could well result in an even more conservative church.»^[70]

Patriarch Kirill (since 2009)[edit]

On 27 January 2009, the ROC Local Council elected Metropolitan Kirill of Smolensk Patriarch of Moscow and All Rus′ by 508 votes out of a total of 700.^[71] He was enthroned on 1 February 2009.

Patriarch Kirill implemented reforms in the administrative structure of the Moscow Patriarchate: on 27 July 2011 the Holy Synod established the Central Asian Metropolitan District, reorganizing the structure of the Church in Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Turkmenistan.^[72] In addition, on 6 October 2011, at the request of the Patriarch, the Holy Synod introduced the metropoly (Russian: митрополия, mitropoliya), administrative structure bringing together neighboring eparchies.^[73]

Under Patriarch Kirill, the ROC continued to maintain close ties with the Kremlin enjoying the patronage of president Vladimir Putin, who has sought to mobilize Russian Orthodoxy both inside and outside Russia.^[74][75] Patriarch Kirill endorsed Putin’s election in 2012, referring in February to Putin’s tenure in the 2000s as «God’s miracle».^[76][77] Nevertheless, Russian inside sources were quoted in the autumn 2017 as saying that Putin’s relationship with Patriarch Kirill had been deteriorating since 2014 due to the fact that the presidential administration had been misled by the Moscow Patriarchate as to the extent of support for pro-Russian uprising in eastern Ukraine; also, due to Kirill’s personal unpopularity he had come to be viewed as a political liability.^[78][79][80]

Schism with Constantinople[edit]

In 2018, the Moscow Patriarchate’s traditional rivalry with the Patriarchate of Constantinople, coupled with Moscow’s anger over the decision to grant autocephaly to the Ukrainian church by the Ecumenical Patriarch, led the ROC to boycott the Holy Great Council that had been prepared by all the Orthodox Churches for decades.^[81][82]

The Holy Synod of the ROC, at its session on 15 October 2018, severed full communion with the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople.^[83][84] The decision was taken in response to the move made by the Patriarchate of Constantinople a few days prior that effectively ended the Moscow Patriarchate’s jurisdiction over Ukraine and promised autocephaly to Ukraine,^[85] the ROC’s and the Kremlin’s fierce opposition notwithstanding.^{[74][86][87][88]}

While the Ecumenical Patriarchate finalised the establishment of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine on 5 January 2019, the ROC continued to claim that the only legitimate Orthodox jurisdiction in the country, was its branch.^[89] Under a law of Ukraine adopted at the end of 2018, the latter was required to change its official title so as to disclose its affiliation with the Russian Orthodox Church based in an «aggressor state».^[90][91] On 11 December 2019 the Supreme Court of Ukraine allowed the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate (UOC-MP) to retain its name.^[92]

In October 2019, the ROC unilaterally severed communion with the Church of Greece following the latter’s recognition of the Ukrainian autocephaly.^[93] On 3 November, Patriarch Kirill failed to commemorate the Primate of the Church of Greece, Archbishop Ieronymos II of Athens, during a liturgy in Moscow.^[94] Additionally, the ROC leadership imposed pilgrimage bans for its faithful in respect of a number of dioceses in Greece, including that of Athens.^[95]

On 8 November 2019, the Russian Orthodox Church announced that Patriarch Kirill would stop commemorating the Patriarch of Alexandria and all Africa after the latter and his Church recognized the OCU that same day.^[96][97][98]

On 27 September 2021, the ROC established a religious day of remembrance for all Eastern Orthodox Christians which were persecuted by the Soviet regime. This day is the 30 October.^[99][100]

Russian invasion of Ukraine, 2022[edit]

Metropolitan Onufriy of Kyiv, primate of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate) (UOC-MP) called the war «a disaster» stating that «The Ukrainian and Russian peoples came out of the Dnieper Baptismal font, and the war between these peoples is a repetition of the sin of Cain, who killed his own brother out of envy. Such a war has no justification either from God or from people.»^[102] He also appealed directly to Putin, asking for an immediate end to the «fratricidal war».^[103][104] In April 2022, after the Russian invasion, many UOC-MP parishes signaled their intention to switch allegiance to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine.^[105] The attitude and stance of Patriarch Kirill of Moscow to the war is one of the oft quoted reasons.^[101] The head of the Russian Orthodox Church in Lithuania, Metropolitan Innocent (Vasilyev) [ru], called Patriarch Kirill’s «political statements about the war» his «personal opinion».^[101] On 7 March 2022, Alexander (Kudryashov) [lv], head of the Latvian Orthodox Church, condemned the Russian invasion of Ukraine.^[106]

On 27 February 2022, a group of 286 Russian Orthodox priests published an open letter calling for an end to the war and criticised the suppression of non-violent anti-war protests in Russia.^[107] On 6 March 2022, Russian Orthodox priest of Moscow Patriarchate’s Kostroma Diocese was fined by Russian authorities for anti-war sermon and stressing the importance of the commandment «Thou shalt not kill.»^[108] Some priests in the Russian Orthodox Church have publicly opposed the invasion, with some facing arrest under the Russian 2022 war censorship laws.^{[109][110][111]} In Kazakhstan, Russian Orthodox priest Iakov Vorontsov, who signed an open letter condemning the invasion of Ukraine, was forced to resign.^[112] Former Russian Orthodox priest Father Grigory Michnov-Vaytenko, head of the Russian Apostolic Church [ru] — a recognized religious organization founded by other dissident priests such as Father Gleb Yakunin — said that «The [Russian Orthodox] church now works like the commissars did in the Soviet Union. And people of course see it. People don’t like it. Especially after February [2022], a lot of people have left the church, both priests and people who were there for years.»^[113]

Patriarch Kirill has referred to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine as «current events» and has avoided using terms like war or invasion,^[115] thereby complying with Russian censorship law.^[116] Kirill approves the invasion, and has blessed the Russian soldiers fighting there. As a consequence, several priests of the Russian Orthodox Church in Ukraine have stopped mentioning Kirill’s name during the divine service.^[117] The Moscow patriarchate views Ukraine as a part of their «canonical territory». Kirill has said that the Russian army has chosen a very correct way.^[118]

Kirill sees gay pride parades as a part of the reason behind Russian warfare against Ukraine.^[119] He has said that the war is not physically, but rather metaphysically, important.^[120]

In the days after the world learned about the 2022 Bucha massacre by Russian invaders of Ukraine, Kirill said that his faithful should be to ready «protect our home» under any circumstance.^[121]

On 6 March 2022 (Forgiveness Sunday holiday), during the liturgy in the Church of Christ the Savior, he justified Russia’s attack on Ukraine, stating that it was necessary to side with «Donbas» (i.e. Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republic), where he said there is an ongoing 8-year «genocide» by Ukraine and where, Kirill said, Ukraine wants to enforce gay pride events upon local population. Despite the holiday being dedicated to the concept of forgiveness, Kirill said there can’t be forgiveness without delivering «justice» first, otherwise it’s a capitulation and weakness.^[122] The speech came under international scrutiny, as Kirill parroted President Putin’s claim that Russia was fighting «fascism» in Ukraine.^[123] Throughout the speech, Kirill did not use the term «Ukrainian», but rather referred to both Russians and Ukrainians simply as «Holy Russians», also claiming Russian soldiers in Ukraine were «laying down their lives for a friend», referencing the Gospel of John.^[123]

On 9 March 2022, after the liturgy, he declared that Russia has the right to use force against Ukraine to ensure Russia’s security, that Ukrainians and Russians are one people, that Russia and Ukraine are one country, that the West incites Ukrainians to kill Russians to sow discord between Russians and Ukrainians and gives weapons to Ukrainians for this specific purpose, and therefore the West is an enemy of Russia and God.^[124]

In a letter to the World Council of Churches (WCC) sent in March 2022, Kirill justified the attack on Ukraine by NATO enlargement, the protection of Russian language, and the establishment of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine. In this letter, he did not express condolences over deaths among Ukrainians.^[125][126]

Kirill participated in a Zoom video call with Pope Francis on 16 March 2022, of which Francis stated in an interview^[127] that Kirill «read from a piece of paper he was holding in his hand all the reasons that justify the Russian invasion.»^[128]

Representatives of the Vatican have criticized Kirill for his lack of willingness to seek peace in Ukraine.^[129] On 3 April, the former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams said there was a strong case for expelling the Russian Orthodox Church from the WCC, saying, «When a Church is actively supporting a war of aggression, failing to condemn nakedly obvious breaches of any kind of ethical conduct in wartime, then other Churches do have the right to raise the question … I am still waiting for any senior member of the Orthodox hierarchy to say that the slaughter of the innocent is condemned unequivocally by all forms of Christianity.»^[130]

The Russian Orthodox St Nicholas church in Amsterdam, Netherlands, has declared that it is no longer possible to function within the Moscow patriarchate because of the attitude that Kirill has taken to the Russian invasion, and instead requested to join the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople.^[131] The Russian Orthodox Church in Lithuania has declared that they do not share the political views and perception of Kirill and therefore are seeking independence from Moscow.^[132]

On 10 April 2022, 200 priests from the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate) released an open request to the primates of the other autocephalous Eastern Orthodox Churches, asking them to convene a Council of Primates of the Ancient Eastern Churches at the Pan-Orthodox level and try Kirill for the heresy of preaching the «Doctrine of the Russian world» and the moral crimes of «blessing the war against Ukraine and fully supporting the aggressive nature of Russian troops on the territory of Ukraine.» They noted that they «can’t continue to remain in any form of canonical subordination to the Moscow Patriarch,» and requested that the Council of Primates «bring Patriarch Kirill to justice and deprive him of the right to hold the patriarchal throne.»^[133][134]

When the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate) removed itself from the Moscow Patriarchate on 27 May 2022, Kirill claimed that the «spirits of malice» wanted to separate the Russian and Ukrainian peoples but they will not succeed.^[135] The Ukrainian church released a declaration in which it stated «it had adopted relevant additions and changes to the Statute on the Administration of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, which testify to the complete autonomy and independence of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.»^[136] The church did not publish its new constitution.^[137] Although in this Ukrainian Orthodox Church clergymen now claims that ‘any provisions that at least somehow hinted at or indicated the connection with Moscow were excluded’ the Russian Orthodox Church ignores this and continues to include UOC-MP clerics in its various commissions or working groups despite these individuals not agreeing to this nor even wanting to be included.^[138]

Cardinal Kurt Koch, president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, said that the patriarch’s legitimization of the «brutal and absurd war» is «a heresy.»^[139]

Kirill supported the mobilization of citizens to go to the front in Ukraine, he urged citizens to fulfill their military duty and that if they gave their lives for their country they will be with God in his kingdom.^{[140][141][142]}

Structure and organization[edit]

The ROC constituent parts in other than the Russian Federation countries of its exclusive jurisdiction such as Ukraine, Belarus et al., are legally registered as separate legal entities in accordance with the relevant legislation of those independent states.

Ecclesiastiacally, the ROC is organized in a hierarchical structure. The lowest level of organization, which normally would be a single ROC building and its attendees, headed by a priest who acts as Father superior (Russian: настоятель, nastoyatel), constitute a parish (Russian: приход, prihod). All parishes in a geographical region belong to an eparchy (Russian: епархия—equivalent to a Western diocese). Eparchies are governed by bishops (Russian: епископ, episcop or архиерей, archiereus). There are 261 Russian Orthodox eparchies worldwide (June 2012).

Further, some eparchies may be organized into exarchates (currently the Belarusian exarchate), and since 2003 into metropolitan districts (митрополичий округ), such as the ROC eparchies in Kazakhstan and the Central Asia (Среднеазиатский митрополичий округ).

Since the early 1990s, the ROC eparchies in some newly independent states of the former USSR enjoy the status of self-governing Churches within the Moscow Patriarchate (which status, according to the ROC legal terminology, is distinct from the «autonomous» one): the Estonian Orthodox Church of Moscow Patriarchate, Latvian Orthodox Church, Moldovan Orthodox Church, Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate) (UOC-MP), the last one being virtually fully independent in administrative matters. (Following Russia’s 2014 Invasion of Ukraine, the UOC-MP—which held nearly a third of the ROC(MP)’s churches—began to fragment, particularly since 2019, with some separatist congregations leaving the ROC(MP) to join the newly independent Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU) despite strident objections from the Moscow Patriarchate and the Russian government.^[143][81])

Similar status, since 2007, is enjoyed by the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia (previously fully independent and deemed schismatic by the ROC). The Chinese Orthodox Church and the Japanese Orthodox Churches were granted full autonomy by the Moscow Patriarchate, but this autonomy is not universally recognized.

Smaller eparchies are usually governed by a single bishop. Larger eparchies, exarchates, and self-governing Churches are governed by a Metropolitan archbishop and sometimes also have one or more bishops assigned to them.

The highest level of authority in the ROC is vested in the Local Council (Pomestny Sobor), which comprises all the bishops as well as representatives from the clergy and laypersons. Another organ of power is the Bishops’ Council (Архиерейский Собор). In the periods between the Councils the highest administrative powers are exercised by the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church, which includes seven permanent members and is chaired by the Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia, Primate of the Moscow Patriarchate.

Although the Patriarch of Moscow enjoys extensive administrative powers, unlike the Pope, he has no direct canonical jurisdiction outside the Urban Diocese of Moscow^{[citation needed]}, nor does he have single-handed authority over matters pertaining to faith as well as issues concerning the entire Orthodox Christian community such as the Catholic-Orthodox split.

Orthodox Church in America (OCA)[edit]

The OCA has its origins in a mission established by eight Russian Orthodox monks in Alaska, then part of Russian America, in 1794. This grew into a full diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church after the United States purchased Alaska from Russia in 1867. By the late 19th century, the Russian Orthodox Church had grown in other areas of the United States due to the arrival of immigrants from areas of Eastern and Central Europe, many of them formerly of the Eastern Catholic Churches («Greek Catholics»), and from the Middle East. These immigrants, regardless of nationality or ethnic background, were united under a single North American diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church.

During the Second World War, the Patriarchate of Moscow unsuccessfully attempted to regain control of the groups which were located abroad. After it resumed its communication with Moscow in the early 1960s, and after it was granted autocephaly in 1970, the Metropolia became known as the Orthodox Church in America.^[144] But its autocephalous status is not universally recognized. The Ecumenical Patriarch (who has jurisdiction over the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America) and some other jurisdictions have not officially accepted it. The Ecumenical Patriarch and the other jurisdictions remain in communion with the OCA. The Patriarchate of Moscow thereby renounced its former canonical claims in the United States and Canada; it also acknowledged the establishment of an autonomous church in Japan in 1970.

Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia (ROCOR)[edit]

Russia’s Church was devastated by the repercussions of the Bolshevik Revolution. One of its effects was a flood of refugees from Russia to the United States, Canada, and Europe. The Revolution of 1918 severed large sections of the Russian church—dioceses in America, Japan, and Manchuria, as well as refugees in Europe—from regular contacts with the main church.

On 28 December 2006, it was officially announced that the Act of Canonical Communion would finally be signed between the ROC and ROCOR. The signing took place on 17 May 2007, followed immediately by a full restoration of communion with the Moscow Patriarchate, celebrated by a Divine Liturgy at the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour in Moscow, at which the Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia Alexius II and the First Hierarch of ROCOR concelebrated for the first time.

Under the Act, the ROCOR remains a self-governing entity within the Church of Russia. It is independent in its administrative, pastoral, and property matters. It continues to be governed by its Council of Bishops and its Synod, the Council’s permanent executive body. The First-Hierarch and bishops of the ROCOR are elected by its Council and confirmed by the Patriarch of Moscow. ROCOR bishops participate in the Council of Bishops of the entire Russian Church.

In response to the signing of the act of canonical communion, Bishop Agathangel (Pashkovsky) of Odesa and parishes and clergy in opposition to the Act broke communion with ROCOR, and established ROCA(A).^[145] Some others opposed to the Act have joined themselves to other Greek Old Calendarist groups.^[146]

Currently both the OCA and ROCOR, since 2007, are in communion with the ROC.

Self-governing branches of the ROC[edit]

The Russian Orthodox Church has four levels of self-government.^{[147][148][clarification needed]}

The autonomous churches which are part of the ROC are:

1. Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate), a special status autonomy close to autocephaly
2. Self-governed churches (Estonia, Latvia, Moldova)
3. Belarusian Orthodox Church, an exarchate
4. Pakistan Orthodox Church
5. Metropolitan District of Kazakhstan
6. Japanese Orthodox Church
7. Chinese Orthodox Church
8. Archdiocese of Russian Orthodox churches in Western Europe

Although the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate) claims that ‘any provisions that at least somehow hinted at or indicated the connection with Moscow were excluded’ (following the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine) the Russian Orthodox Church ignores this and continues to include UOC-MP clerics in various commissions or working groups despite these individuals not agreeing to this nor even wanting to be included.^[149]

Worship and practices[edit]

Canonization[edit]

In accordance with the practice of the Orthodox Church, a particular hero of faith can initially be canonized only at a local level within local churches and eparchies. Such rights belong to the ruling hierarch and it can only happen when the blessing of the patriarch is received. The task of believers of the local eparchy is to record descriptions of miracles, to create the hagiography of a saint, to paint an icon, as well as to compose a liturgical text of a service where the saint is canonized. All of this is sent to the Synodal Commission for canonization which decides whether to canonize the local hero of faith or not. Then the patriarch gives his blessing and the local hierarch performs the act of canonization at the local level. However, the liturgical texts in honor of a saint are not published in all Church books but only in local publications. In the same way, these saints are not yet canonized and venerated by the whole Church, only locally. When the glorification of a saint exceeds the limits of an eparchy, then the patriarch and Holy Synod decides about their canonization on the Church level. After receiving the Synod’s support and the patriarch’s blessing, the question of glorification of a particular saint on the scale of the entire Church is given for consideration to the Local Council of the Russian Orthodox Church.

In the period following the revolution, and during the communist persecutions up to 1970, no canonizations took place. In 1970, the Holy Synod decided to canonize a missionary to Japan, Nicholas Kasatkin (1836–1912). In 1977, St. Innocent of Moscow (1797–1879), the Metropolitan of Siberia, the Far East, the Aleutian Islands, Alaska, and Moscow was also canonized. In 1978 it was proclaimed that the Russian Orthodox Church had created a prayer order for Meletius of Kharkov, which practically signified his canonization because that was the only possible way to do it at that time. Similarly, the saints of other Orthodox Churches were added to the Church calendar: in 1962 St. John the Russian, in 1970 St. Herman of Alaska, in 1993 Silouan the Athonite, the elder of Mount Athos, already canonized in 1987 by the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople. In the 1980s the Russian Orthodox Church re-established the process for canonization; a practice that had ceased for half a century.

In 1989, the Holy Synod established the Synodal Commission for canonization. The 1990 Local Council of the Russian Orthodox Church gave an order for the Synodal Commission for Canonisation to prepare documents for canonization of new martyrs who had suffered from the 20th century Communist repressions. In 1991 it was decided that a local commission for canonization would be established in every eparchy which would gather the local documents and would send them to the Synodal Commission. Its task was to study the local archives, collect memories of believers, record all the miracles that are connected with addressing the martyrs. In 1992 the Church established 25 January as a day when it venerates the new 20th century martyrs of faith. The day was specifically chosen because on this day in 1918 the Metropolitan of Kiev Vladimir (Bogoyavlensky) was killed, thus becoming the first victim of communist terror among the hierarchs of the Church.

During the 2000 Council of the Russian Orthodox Church, the greatest general canonization in the history of the Orthodox Church took place: not only regarding the number of saints but also as in this canonization, all unknown saints were mentioned. There were 1,765 canonized saints known by name and others unknown by name but «known to God».^[150]

Icon painting[edit]

The use and making of icons entered Kievan Rus’ following its conversion to Orthodox Christianity in AD 988. As a general rule, these icons strictly followed models and formulas hallowed by Byzantine art, led from the capital in Constantinople. As time passed, the Russians widened the vocabulary of types and styles far beyond anything found elsewhere in the Orthodox world. Russian icons are typically paintings on wood, often small, though some in churches and monasteries may be much larger. Some Russian icons were made of copper.^[151] Many religious homes in Russia have icons hanging on the wall in the krasny ugol, the «red» or «beautiful» corner. There is a rich history and elaborate religious symbolism associated with icons. In Russian churches, the nave is typically separated from the sanctuary by an iconostasis (Russian ikonostas, иконостас), or icon-screen, a wall of icons with double doors in the centre. Russians sometimes speak of an icon as having been «written», because in the Russian language (like Greek, but unlike English) the same word (pisat’, писать in Russian) means both to paint and to write. Icons are considered to be the Gospel in paint, and therefore careful attention is paid to ensure that the Gospel is faithfully and accurately conveyed. Icons considered miraculous were said to «appear». The «appearance» (Russian: yavlenie, явление) of an icon is its supposedly miraculous discovery. «A true icon is one that has ‘appeared’, a gift from above, one opening the way to the Prototype and able to perform miracles».^[152]

Bell ringing[edit]

Bell ringing, which has a history in the Russian Orthodox tradition dating back to the baptism of Rus’, plays an important part in the traditions of the Russian Orthodox Church.

Ecumenism and interfaith relations[edit]

In May 2011, Hilarion Alfeyev, the Metropolitan of Volokolamsk and head of external relations for the Moscow Patriarchate of the Russian Orthodox Church, stated that Orthodox and Evangelical Christians share the same positions on «such issues as abortion, the family, and marriage» and desire «vigorous grassroots engagement» between the two Christian communions on such issues.^[153]

The Metropolitan also believes in the possibility of peaceful coexistence between Islam and Christianity because the two religions have never fought religious wars in Russia.^[154] Alfeyev stated that the Russian Orthodox Church «disagrees with atheist secularism in some areas very strongly» and «believes that it destroys something very essential about human life.»^[154]

Today, the Russian Orthodox Church has ecclesiastical missions in Jerusalem and some other countries around the world.^[155][156]

Membership[edit]

The ROC is often said^[157] to be the largest of all of the Eastern Orthodox churches in the world. Including all the autocephalous churches under its supervision, its adherents number more than 112 million worldwide—about half of the 200 to 220 million^[11][158] estimated adherents of the Eastern Orthodox Church. Among Christian churches, the Russian Orthodox Church is only second to the Roman Catholic Church in terms of numbers of followers. Within Russia the results of a 2007 VTsIOM poll indicated that about 75% of the population considered itself Orthodox Christian.^[159] Up to 65% of ethnic Russians^[160][161] as well as Russian-speakers from Russia who are members of other ethnic groups (Ossetians, Chuvash,^[162] Caucasus Greeks, Kryashens^[163] etc.) and a similar percentage of Belarusians and Ukrainians identify themselves as «Orthodox».^[159][160] However, according to a poll published by the church related website Pravmir.com [ru] in December 2012, only 41% of the Russian population identified itself with the Russian Orthodox Church.^[164] Pravmir.com also published a 2012 poll by the respected Levada organization VTsIOM indicating that 74% of Russians considered themselves Orthodox.^[165] The 2017 Survey Religious Belief and National Belonging in Central and Eastern Europe made by the Pew Research Center showed that 71% of Russians declared themselves as Orthodox Christian,^[166] and in 2021, the Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM) estimated that 66% of Russians were Orthodox Christians.^[167]

See also[edit]

• Eparchies and Metropolitanates of the Russian Orthodox Church
• List of Slavic studies journals

References[edit]

Notes[edit]

Citations[edit]

Sources[edit]

Further reading[edit]

Since 1991

Historical

Historiography

External links[edit]

Media related to Russian Orthodox Church at Wikimedia Commons

• Official website (in Russian)
• Department for External Church Relations of the Russian Orthodox Church official website (in English)
• Russian Orthodox Church‘s channel on YouTube (in Russian)